'Get over it': Internet reacts as UK bans Demi Lovato’s ‘Holy Fvck’ album cover for offending Christians
LONDON, UK: British billboards removed Demi Lovato's album poster after the depiction of the poster was considered to cause "serious offense" to Christians as per the United Kingdom’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA). Last summer, the poster in the UK which promoted her new album 'Holy Fvck' was placed across London. However, the bondage-Esque portrayal and the contents of the poster were noticed by advertising regulators, who then took action to get it pulled down.
Lovato is seen lying on a cross, wearing a bondage outfit with the album title written over the poster. The poster in total is likely to offend Christian viewers according to ASA's official ruling based on the album title 'Holy Fvck' and the poster content's sexualization of the religion. "Bound up in a bondage-style outfit whilst lying on a mattress shaped like a crucifix, in a position with her legs bound to one side which was reminiscent of Christ on the cross,” the advertising regulators described the singer's image in the poster and concluded stating, “We, therefore, concluded the ad breached the Code.”
ALSO READ
‘Feeling more feminine’: Demi Lovato starts using ‘she/her’ pronouns along with 'they/them’
HOLY FVCK 🩸 8/19 | https://t.co/0kHeJGhxdi pic.twitter.com/HnbmNrXmZS
— Demi Lovato (@ddlovato) June 6, 2022
'Why do people still question art?'
Reacting to the ban on Lovato's album posters, social media erupted with different takes on whether the poster is offensive or not. One user wrote, "The stars love it, they have been using religion for years to gain shock value, Madonna used to do it all the time cause they know they get a rise out of that community and it causes controversies. Music industries had become transparent, and boring."
Another user tweeted, "Okay let’s just get this clear. Just because people in a religion offend you doesn’t mean the religion deserves disrespect. That’s like me saying “I dislike the color purple because people who like the color offended me” it doesn’t make sense. Separate them!," and another wrote, "It’s just a damn cover, get over it! Demi didn’t do this to offend people or the religion, she just did what she was feeling at the time. Stop hating for nothing. Just get over it."
"I'm a Christian and I'm not slightly offended by this lol. Some artists have done worse than this and they haven't been banned they just hate Demi Lovato," someone opined.
The stars love it, they have been using religion for years to gain shock value, Madonna used to do it all the time cause they know they get a rise out of that community and it causes controversies.
— Simon Marsh (@simonmarshlive) January 13, 2023
Music industries had become transparent, and boring
Okay let’s just get this clear. Just because people in a religion offend you doesn’t mean the religion deserves disrespect. That’s like me saying “I dislike the color purple because people who like the color offended me” it doesn’t make sense. Separate them!
— amanda (@tojisslvr) January 12, 2023
It’s just a damn cover, get over it! Demi didn’t do this to offend people or the religion, she just did what she was feeling at the time. Stop hating for nothing. Just get over it
— HOLY FUCK (@cralioj) January 12, 2023
I'm a Christian and I'm not slightly offended by this lol. Some artists have done worse than this and they haven't been banned they just hate Demi Lovato
— 𝓖𝓮𝓮𝓴𝓪𝔂 (@_geekayy_) January 12, 2023
One user wrote, "Wait til the world scrolls through punk and metal album covers from the last 40 years," and another reacted, "She disrespected a religious symbol. That's not a serve, that's gross."
"Regardless of the religious aspect of the issue at this point. Why would you do this... other than for the mad attention it's obviously commanding," someone remarked while another user wrote, "Oh please. Why do people still question art?"
Wait til the world scrolls through punk and metal album covers from the last 40 years
— Elliot (@elliotcomedy) January 12, 2023
She disrespected a religous symbol. Thats not a serve, thats gross.
— will 🏴 (@will667755) January 12, 2023
Irregardless of the religious aspect of the issue at this point. Why would you do this... other than for the mad attention it's obvious commanding 🤷🏿♀️
— G. (@GWomenwithissue) January 11, 2023
This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.