Prince Charles could get full custody of Harry and Meghan's baby Archie when he becomes king, says expert

A 300-year-old royal prerogative means that the ruling monarch is believed to have automatic custody of all the minor grandchildren
UPDATED JAN 10, 2020
(Getty Images)
(Getty Images)

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's bombshell announcement has resulted in many questions regarding the future of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. 

According to a report by international legal advisory CS Global Partners, a 300-year-old royal prerogative means that the ruling monarch is believed to have automatic custody of all the minor grandchildren.

However, it is not an Act of Parliament and since Queen Elizabeth is baby Archie's great-grandmother, this royal right is not valid. 

However, Prince Charles, who is baby Archie's grandfather could have custody over Archie once he becomes monarch. This is based on the principle regarding the ruling sovereign's right to veto the line of succession of the first six heirs to the throne.

Since baby Archie falls under the first six heirs once Prince Charles becomes monarch, Charles could very well have custody over Archie. 

For the time being, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have full custody of Archie for as long as Queen Elizabeth rules unless the royal prerogative is adapted into an Act of Parliament.

We had previously reported that Harry and Meghan took to Instagram to announce their decision to "step back" as senior members of the royal family.

The post shared that the couple plan to "work to become financially independent by starting to carve out a progressive new role within this institution."

This leads to the question of whether the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are renouncing their titles given that they are stepping back from senior royal duties. 

There is a difference between the two — renouncing the royal title would mean that they are losing out on the royal allowance and that they would no longer work under the "royal title".

This would also mean that they would have to become financially independent. Considering Harry and Meghan's intention to continue to carry out royal duties in the name of the Queen could mean that either they have found a loophole or they will be stripped of their "working royals" status. 

If the second happens, then they will follow in Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie's footsteps of having independent jobs but retaining their titles as princesses.

RELATED TOPICS MEGHAN MARKLE PRINCE CHARLES

GET THE BIGGEST CELEBRITY & ENTERTAINMENT STORIES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

John Oliver was bleeped out twice during his brief, 15-second Emmys acceptance speech on live television after he roasted host Nate Bargatze
Sep 15, 2025
Kevin Hart doesn't appreciate paparazzi’s question after viral video of him hosting Diddy’s party resurfaces
Apr 6, 2025
Diddy’s childhood friend Tim Patterson claims Janice Combs’s wild parties often involved pimps, homosexuals, and other adult activities
Apr 6, 2025
Lisa Marie Presley and Michael Jackson tied the knot in 1994, but she initially thought the King of Pop was a creep—and we totally get why
Apr 6, 2025
Riley Keough opens up about the Presley family curse in a candid interview while on tour for her book, 'From Here to the Great Unknown'
Apr 5, 2025
Natalie Morales hits back after her interview with Seth Meyers is removed from all platforms due to a revealing outfit
Apr 5, 2025
"Babyface, can you believe she wants me to dress like a girl?" Michael Jackson told a producer.
Apr 2, 2025
Sofia Vergara also dished out on why she doesn't ever want to play Modern Family's Gloria again
Apr 2, 2025
"It took more and more to get high, and I honestly don't know when your body decides it can't deal with it anymore," Lisa Marie Presley wrote.
Apr 1, 2025
A family member's last-minute intervention saved Michael Jackson from the 9/11 tragedy—here’s what happened
Apr 1, 2025