Andrew Tate labels men 'lazy, weak and stupid', imagines himself as 'ruler' in Roman Empire, Internet calls him 'slave'
BUCHAREST, ROMANIA: Andrew Tate, the polarizing social media figure known for his controversial views on masculinity, recently used the platform 'X' (formerly Twitter) to claim that men are characterized by laziness, weakness, and foolishness.
Tate's perspectives on masculinity have faced criticism from numerous online community members.
He has previously asserted his ideas regarding how men should conduct themselves, fueling ongoing discussions and debates.
Andrew Tate claims to be ruler in Roman Empire
In a recent tweet, Tate criticized men who contemplated and discussed the Roman Empire, stating, "Most men who think about the Roman Empire do not think about their place within the empire. I would be a war general - likely to die as ruler."
Tate continued, asserting, "I know you like to think the same. But your life proves you’d be a peasant or slave. All of you are lazy weak and stupid."
Most men who think about the Roman Empire do not think about their place within the empire.
— Andrew Tate (@Cobratate) November 13, 2023
I would be a war general - likely to die as ruler.
I know you like to think the same.
But your life proves you’d be a peasant or slave.
All of you are lazy weak and stupid.
Trolls say Andrew Tate will be slave in Roman Empire
After Tate's comments regarding men who discuss the Roman Empire and his assertion that they are weak and unintelligent, several users came forward to express their thoughts on his statement.
One user wrote, "Lol. You’d likely be a slave."
Another user asserted Tate would be nothing in the Roman Empire and wrote, "You would be nothing. A nobody. Because you would not have social media to exaggerate your persona and inflate your own ego. You would be a mason worker. A transient. And humble."
A user stated, "I think you grossly overestimate class manoeuvrability in the Roman era. You would most likely be a peasant farm worker like 99% of everyone else. (and me) These are way different times my friend."
Another user commented, "Come on Tate. If its just one Empire, you're neither the richest, bravest nor the greatest. I would say you'd be a wealthy person just like you are rn. This is just a baseless imaginary thought, neglecting a lot of factors and aimed to make people feel bad. If everybody was as rich as you, you probably wouldn't feel special."
You would be nothing. A nobody. Because you would not have social media to exaggerate your persona and inflate your own ego. You would be a mason worker. A transient. And humble.
— Gadsden Fawkes (@Gadsden_Fawkes) November 13, 2023
I think you grossly overestimate class manoeuvrability in the Roman era. You would most likely be a peasant farm worker like 99% of everyone else. (and me)
— The Man Cave Project (@BroTokenHive) November 14, 2023
These are way different times my friend.
Come on Tate. If its just one Empire, you're neither the richest, bravest nor the greatest. I would say you'd be a wealthy person just like you are rn. This is just a baseless imaginary thought, neglecting a lot of factors and aimed to make people feel bad. If everybody was as…
— MEGA (@Megaplanet1) November 14, 2023