What REALLY happened to Scott Smith's daughter? Rape in gender fluid loo opens Pandora's box
An angry mother and father are suing a school district in Loudon County after alleging that their 15-year-old daughter was raped in a girl's bathroom by a 'skirt-wearing' male student. Jess and Scott Smith have accused the district of concealing the alleged crime that happened inside Stone Bridge High School on May 28. The parents have claimed that the Loudoun County school superintendent Scott Ziegler said that he had no records of the alleged assault despite Loudoun County Sheriff's office carrying out a two-month-long probe after the allegations were made.
Smith first made news in June when he was arrested by police during a school board meeting. At the time, he was charged with disorderly conduct. But the upset dad revealed the reason behind his fury at the June 22 meeting earlier this week during an interview to Fox News' ‘The Ingraham Angle'. While the male student, who is also 15, is currently in jail as it was found he allegedly assaulted another girl student at Broad Run High School in Loudoun County on October 6.
Dad whose daughter was 'raped’ in girl's bathroom by 'skirt-wearing' male slams Merrick Garland
Mother slammed for asking 6-year-old 'are you a boy or a girl?' in viral TikTok video: 'This is child abuse'
Loudoun County dad Scott Smith dragged out of school woke board meeting & found guilty of disorderly conduct/resisting arrest reveals his daughter was 'raped' in the girls' bathroom by a 'skirt-wearing' boy who was arrested for a 2nd girl later. & School WOKE Board COVERED IT UP. pic.twitter.com/odjuzYniQz— 🇺🇸Robert.N🇺🇸 (@Rob_Noorollah) October 13, 2021
The law firm -- the Stanley Law Group -- that is representing the Smiths sent a press release to Fox News on Thursday, October 14 that read, “Attorneys for the family of the Stone Bridge High School student who was sexually assaulted in the girls’ restroom on May 28 by a boy claiming to be ‘gender fluid’ today announced they will pursue legal actions against Loudoun County under the provisions of Title IX.” As per the United States Department of Justice, the provisions of Title IX says: “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation, in be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”
The press release also quoted the Smiths as saying, “The sexual assault our daughter endured should never happen to any young girl, or any child, attending a public school.” While their attorney, Bill Stanley, added: “What happened to Mr. and Mrs. Smith and their daughter in Loudoun County is absolutely abhorrent and unacceptable. It is a nightmare no family should have to endure, yet it has happened twice in Loudoun Schools in the same year by the same perpetrator. This is outrageous.” Bill will also fight for Smith after “wrongful and unconstitutional” charges were filed against him in Circuit Court following the June 22 school board meeting.
The suit comes after the Smiths called for Ziegler’s resignation, who during the June meeting, said, “To my knowledge, we don't have any record of assaults occurring in our restrooms.” He also went on to quote research by Time magazine and added: “I think it's important to keep our perspective on this, we've heard it several times tonight from our public speakers but the predator transgender student or person simply does not exist.”
But the Loudoun County Sheriff's office told Fox News that the investigation was launched after the May 28 alleged incident before the suspect was first detained in July. The sheriff’s office said, “We can confirm a May 28, 2021 case that involved a thorough 2-month-long investigation that was conducted to determine the facts of the case prior to arrest. This case is still pending court proceedings. The Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office is not able to provide any documents that pertain to a pending case.”
It has been said the male student was allowed to use girls’ loo because he identified himself as a female. After his July arrest, he was apparently released, but he again allegedly assaulted another female student at another school that also comes under Loudon County in October. Now, he has been held at a juvenile detention center as he awaits a court appearance on all charges, including sexual battery and forcible sodomy.
Meanwhile, on Tuesday evening October 12, a number of parents, students, and residents went to Loudoun County School Board meeting and demanded Ziegler’s resignation. An angry mother said, “This is not China, this is the United States of America, and we will not be silenced. Remove the superintendent immediately and then resign for your negligence and duplicity. End this nightmare!”
Another parent mentioned, “The 8040 policy was rushed through to a vote without consideration for the safety of all students, simply to satisfy a liberal agenda – a policy that you knew full well would allow our children to be abused inside our schools. At least two young women are recent victims of sexual assaults in our high schools, one of them in a restroom. Your moral compasses are busted! You, Dr. Ziegler, and our school board – every one of you – are complicit in these crimes against our children because you did nothing about it, nothing.”
A furious mother added: “What is worse than a child being raped at school? The coverup by those who are trusted with the safety and well-being of children. Today, Scott Ziegler must resign for the unconscionable act of allowing an alleged rapist back into school to rape again, and for that coverup.”
At the recent meeting, a 14-year-old student also showed up and said: “8040 and many policies that are being proposed are not to make people more comfortable or to accept others but instead to change the way my peers and I think, so that we will become the next generation of social justice warriors,” before noting: “I am 14 years old, the fact that I have to be here defending my rights to not have your radical agenda shoved down my throat in school is not only concerning, it's upsetting. My peers and I are not tools to further your political agenda.”